From No Más to What's Next: A Veteran's Guide to the New Verizon-BT Venture
When the new Verizon-BT international joint venture was announced on June 29th, the collective sigh from telecom veterans on both sides of the pond was palpable. After my initial post on the JV, my inbox quickly filled with notes from former colleagues, all sharing flashbacks from the operational realities of v1.0.
Context matters here. Years ago, I managed the BT Alliance for MCI, drove the Concert business plan to approval and closing (including BT's initial $3.2B investment), and ran the alliance day-to-day alongside my BT counterparts. I spent two years in the situation room and the board room, never the bleachers.
While it is tempting to dwell on what went wrong the first time, the real value lies in how this new venture can apply the hard-won lessons of its predecessor. If Verizon and BT want to avoid the ghosts of JVs past, here is the forward-looking playbook they need to adopt:
1. Overcome the "Not Invented Here" (NIH) Baggage. The original venture forced the two companies into a "best in breed" selection process on competing enterprise products that quickly devolved into a cage match. Verizon and BT already sell overlapping products today. To succeed, the new JV must replace emotional product attachments with ruthless, customer-centric objectivity. Leadership needs to empower an independent integration team to make swift, definitive product decisions based purely on market demand and interoperability, leaving NIH egos at the door.
2. Hard Code the Rules of Engagement and Pricing. In v1.0, it was never really understood where value could be added and profit made before the original venture went into a massive "build" mode. Transfer pricing and margin visibility must be mapped out before launch, not built on the fly. Furthermore, to prevent the inevitable reply-all keyboard combat over account ownership, rules of engagement cannot rely on handshake agreements. They must be built into CRM systems and compensation structures immediately, ensuring sales teams are financially aligned to partner rather than compete.
3. Break the 50:50 Gridlock. A 50:50 split, punctuated by Verizon's $625M "equalization payment" to BT, is equitable on paper but can be a recipe for paralysis in practice. When parents want different things and neither can force a decision, conflict is inevitable. To avoid the gridlock that plagued the original JV, this venture needs a pre-agreed, binding mechanism for dispute resolution. Whether that means appointing an independent tie-breaking board member or carving out specific domains of absolute authority for each parent, they must establish how to move forward when deadlocks happen.
4. Navigate a Radically Different Ecosystem. While the new venture smartly frees both parents to defend their domestic turf, its international success is far from guaranteed. The global connectivity landscape no longer favors the legacy infrastructure bottlenecks of the past. Today, enterprise connectivity is won on software-defined agility. A swarm of well-funded, digital-native disruptors from API-driven NaaS platforms to multi-cloud orchestrators are already delivering the AI-optimized, frictionless experiences that modern multinationals demand. As Verizon and BT spend the next year navigating the notoriously difficult governance and integration of a 50:50 structure as well as obtaining the necessary regulatory clearances, these agile competitors will be actively exploiting that distraction window. Legacy scale is no longer a protective moat; instead of waiting for a starting gun next year, the new JV must immediately prove it can deliver cutting-edge enterprise flexibility, or risk becoming a massive, slow-moving target for new players who are already miles down the road.
Note: The VZ-BT agreements are confidential. These thoughts draw strictly on public news accounts, company statements and my two years’ experience managing the original BT-MCI alliance, not on any inside knowledge of the new deal.
#Telecom #JointVenture #Verizon #BT #Telecommunications #NaaS #CorporateStrategy #LessonsLearned #Connectivity #Platform #International #Competition
